\appendix
\chapter{Report of Meetings}
\section*{1st Meeting}
\begin{description}
 \item[Date:] 13th March 1999
 \item[Place:] Institute for ComputerScience Room 2.30
 \item[Persons:] Nicolas Goell, Mark Rehbichler, Roland Knall, Roland Schwaiger
 \item[Discussion:] Our assisting project controller came up with some past work
 on our subject. He came up with a paper, which will be included in this one, in a
 shorter version (see \ref{ch:intro}). Also we defined a modus operandi for the term,
 discussing the sections, in which this paper will be divided. We also talked about
 the basic materials for this seminar, which can be found online.
\end{description}
\section*{2st Meeting}
\begin{description}
 \item[Date:] 20th March 1999
 \item[Place:] Institute for ComputerScience Room 2.30
 \item[Persons:] Nicolas Goell, Mark Rehbichler, Roland Knall, Roland Schwaiger, Brigitte Kendlbacher
 \item[Discussion:] We discussed the paper, we had to summarize. We talked about the pro's and con's of solving the problem with SANE, and what SANE in general is. We also sorted out some problems which could be improved during this work.
\begin{itemize}
  \item Only one hidden layer is used. 
  \item Nodes in the hidden layer can only connect to nodes from either the input or output layer. No information flows between nodes in the hidden layer.
  \item The number of neurons in the input and output layer is big.
\end{itemize}
We also dicussed solutions for this problem, including the following:
\begin{itemize}
  \item Changing the possibilities for nodes to connect to other nodes.
  \item Evaluation of the ``blueprints''
  \item General changes could be done to the input and output layer.
\end{itemize}
We also talked about the realization of \ANN s with NetJen. And the differents 
between the solution using SANE and a solution using NetJen.

\end{description}
